The Truth Behind Spirit Photography

Ghostly Visitors from Beyond

© Beverly Hill

Mar 8, 2008
Ghostly mist, Chris Friese
Since the invention of the camera, unexplained images have been caught on film. Could these ghostly images be real or are they deliberate hoaxes?

In a world of uncertainty, the inquisitive nature of the human brain pushes us to seek out answers for the unexplained. Not wanting to be limited to the confines of a mortal existence, people search for proof of an existence beyond the physical realm.

In the case of spirit photography, it is this yearning desire for proof that allowed charlatans and hoaxsters to prey on the bereaved and separate them from their hard-earned money. It may be surprising to learn that it’s a practice that is still going on today.

Then and Now

Spirit photography first came into being in the early 1860s when seances, channeling, and psychic readings were in fashion as a form of entertainment for celebrities and high society. Although some of the photographers were thought to be legitimate, the fakes greatly outnumbered them.

Pictures from these encounters were numerous, and often showed images of figures standing behind the person being photographed. Photos would be faked through a variety of means such as double exposures, prepared plates, and time-lapse photography. More elaborate hoaxes involved the use of assistants masquerading as the deceased.

In other photos, both then and now, where spirits appeared unintentionally, the image can most often be explained as the result of lens flare, light reflection, camera flaw, dust, insects, and atmospheric disturbances such as fog or vapor.

As times move forward, the art of capturing spirits of the deceased on film has grown more advanced. Digital cameras and photo editing software reside in almost every home. With whole industries dedicated to creating special effects such as those in the movies, it’s not hard to produce a believable spirit photograph.

Not to be left out, Hollywood is also cashing in on the paranormal bandwagon by creating reality TV shows that attempt to capture ghosts and ratings. Combine that with proceeds from sales of paranormal-related items, and the ghost business can be quite lucrative.

Can They Be Proved?

Technology also gives us the tools needed to separate the legitimate photos from the questionable ones. If ghosts are real, perhaps because they are intangible in nature, they may only be photographed when conditions are perfect. Or perhaps the equipment required to capture a real image has yet to be invented.

The questions still remain. When faced with a credible photograph, what other image is being captured? The skeptics will always search for a technical explanation, while the believers will always be looking for the elusive proof to the contrary. Unless there is irrefutable proof, the question will remain unanswered.

But as for those people claiming to be able to photograph your lost loved ones for a fee, save your money and seek your own truths.

Interested in learning more? Read this interview with a paranormal photographer.


The copyright of the article The Truth Behind Spirit Photography in Ghosts & Hauntings is owned by Beverly Hill. Permission to republish The Truth Behind Spirit Photography in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.


Ghostly mist, Chris Friese
       


Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo

Comments
Oct 22, 2008 1:48 AM
Guest :
It's called fog.
Oct 22, 2008 5:07 AM
Beverly Hill :
Fog can indeed be one of the causes of an image on film, as noted above in the third paragraph of the Then and Now section. In photography, the dictionary definition of fog is: “a hazy effect on a developed negative or positive, caused by light other than that forming the image, by improper handling during development, or by the use of excessively old film.” As the move to digital photography has replaced film photography, this is no longer the case.

Externally, atmospheric fog, such as steam, fumes from dry ice, and localized condensation of water vapor can also affect images on film. Even sunlight streaming through a dust cloud can create the effect of fog. It's important, but not always possible, for anyone attempting to perform spirit photography that they do so in a controlled environment free of dust, unlike photographs taken in cemeteries. Most of the “orbs” that are captured in graveyard images are the refraction of light off of a dust or water particles.
2 Comments